Expertise
-
Practice Areas:
- Bar Admissions:
- Education:
- University of Ottawa (2015) JD (Cum Laude)
- Carleton University (2012) Bachelor of International Business (Highest Honours)
Details
- Bio
- Cases
- Associations
- Blog Posts
- News & Media
- Publications & Presentations
- Recognition
Amy Sherrard (she/her)
is an associate at Lenczner Slaght.
Amy has a broad civil litigation and appellate practice and specializes in complex corporate and commercial litigation, class actions, professional liability, and employment disputes. Amy has represented clients before all levels of court in Ontario as well as other provinces. She also has extensive experience representing clients in private commercial arbitrations.
Amy acts for clients of all sizes across many industries and sectors including real estate, technology, health care, hospitality, public sector/government, and professional services firms.
Amy joined the firm after practicing for almost two years at a leading management side employment law boutique where she practiced exclusively in the litigation group. Amy provides employment advice to clients in a number of industries and has extensive experience litigating complex employment law disputes including wrongful dismissal, human rights, and injunctions.
Amy obtained her law degree from the University of Ottawa where she graduated Cum Laude and on the Dean’s Honour List. Prior to her legal career, Amy obtained her Bachelor of International Business from Carleton University, after completing a year abroad in Madrid, Spain.
-
Hummel Properties Inc v Niagara-on-the-Lake (Town)
Counsel to the Interveners in an application involving municipal planning law. Successfully argued that the lower court’s interpretation and application of the Planning Act was overbroad. This decision was the first appellate court to confirm that two ICBLs cannot apply to the same land within the statutory cooling off period even if they are enacted for different purposes.
-
Annapolis Group v Halifax Regional Municipality
Counsel to the plaintiff in an action concerning alleged de facto expropriation, misfeasance in public office, and unjust enrichment relating to the plaintiff’s efforts to develop its lands within the Halifax Regional Municipality. Successfully represented the plaintiff at the Supreme Court of Canada with the Court clarifying the test for de facto expropriation and concluding that our client’s claim for de facto expropriation could proceed to trial.
-
Counsel to the successful respondent in an arbitration about the contractual right to recover interest and other expenses from condominium corporations in relation to the construction of a community center in a private residential community.
-
Wintercorn v Global Learning Group Inc
Counsel to a defendant law firm in a proposed class proceeding in Ontario relating to a tax donation program alleging professional negligence.
-
Ravago Americas LLC v Vinmar International Ltd
Counsel to the defendant employer in an action and injunction concerning allegations of the misuse of confidential information by a former employee.
-
Counsel for the insurer in an arbitration concerning a contractual dispute and the appropriate methodology for the valuation of foreign oil reserves.
-
Piett v Global Learning Group Inc
Counsel to a defendant law firm in a proposed class proceeding in Saskatchewan relating to a tax donation program alleging professional negligence.
-
Lipson v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Counsel to defendant law firm in a class action in connection with a charitable tax program. The Court of Appeal rendered a seminal decision on the commonality of the defence of a limitation period on a certification motion. More recently, the Court held that "quality assurance privilege" may be found on a case-by-case basis in respect of communication within a law firm.
-
Canadian Bar Association
-
Ontario Bar Association
-
The Advocates’ Society
-
Ontario Court of Appeal Restricts Municipality’s Use of Interim Control By-Laws
In a recent decision, Hummel Properties Inc v Niagara-on-the-Lake (Town), the Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed that the Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake’s enactment of an interim control by-law (“ICBL”) was illegal. The decision, summarized below, has important implications for municipalities, developers, and builders across Ontario.
-
The Supreme Court of Canada recently granted leave to appeal in the decision of Murray-Hall c Procureure generale du Quebec, opening the door for the Court to consider the constitutionality of provincial legislation purportedly aimed at regulating cannabis production and possession in the province of Quebec. The case is significant because it focuses on the validity of provincial legislation which directly contradicts federal legislation on the same issue.
-
The SCC Leave Project: Predictions for May 20, 2021
Here’s a look at the leave application decisions that the Supreme Court of Canada will be releasing on May 20, 2021.
-
The SCC Leave Project: Predictions for April 15, 2021
Here’s a look at the leave application decisions that the Supreme Court of Canada will be releasing on April 15, 2021.
-
An individual’s genetic composition is arguably one of the most personal and private types of information out there. As science and technology continue to develop, the collection, use, and disclosure of genetic information has increased exponentially. Medical genetic testing has become a key tool in helping to diagnose and treat complicated illnesses and commercial genetic testing kits, such as 23andMe, have expanded in popularity. All of this has resulted in an exponential increase in the amount personal data being collected in our everyday lives.
-
As the justice system continues to adapt and respond to the COVID-19 crisis, advocates everywhere are faced with new challenges in the administration of justice. Yesterday, the Honourable George R. Strathy, Chief Justice of Ontario and President of the Court of Appeal for Ontario hosted a virtual fireside chat to share the perspective of the judiciary, discussing the effects of COVID-19 on the administration of justice and lessons learned.
-
Lenczner Slaght Successful for Annapolis at Supreme Court of Canada
In Annapolis Group Inc. v Halifax Regional Municipality, our expert litigators were successful at the Supreme Court of Canada in reversing a decision of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal granting summary judgment against Annapolis Group Inc. (“Annapolis”). The Supreme Court of Canada concluded that Annapolis’ claim for de facto expropriation (or, “constructive taking”, the term preferred by the majority of the Supreme Court) could proceed to trial. Peter Griffin, Scott Rollwagen, Rebecca Jones and Amy Sherrard were counsel to Annapolis Group, the successful appellant.
-
SCC Takes Expansive Approach to Regulatory ‘Constructive Taking’ Claims Against Public Authorities
The Lawyer's Daily discussed the SCC's decision in Annapolis Group Inc. v Halifax Regional Municipality. As counsel to the successful appellant, Peter Griffin, Scott Rollwagen, Rebecca Jones, and Amy Sherrard are mentioned in the article.
-
Lenczner Slaght Litigators Recognized Among the Best Lawyers in Canada
In the latest edition of Best Lawyers in Canada, 39 of our expert litigators are recognized by their peers for their expertise across 24 practice areas.
-
Amy Sherrard Joins Lenczner Slaght
Canada’s leading litigation firm adds another exceptionally talented associate to its talent pool.
-
Vaccine Requirements Ending? What It Means for Employees' Rights and Employer Policies Across Canada
Amy Sherrard authored a Lexpert article on the future of vaccine mandates and their impact on Canada's workers.
-
Best Lawyers in Canada (2023)
Ones to Watch – Labour & Employment Law